Sécurité Alimentaire Et Justice Environnementale Dans L'Arctique Canadien: L'Impératif D'Une Participation Accrue Des Inuit À La Gouvernance De L'Environnement (Food Security and Environmental Justice in the Canadian Arctic: The Need for Increased Inuit Participation in Environmental Governance)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Depuis quelques decennies, la degradation de la qualite de l’environnement s’est imposee comme la menace la plus preoccupante a la securite alimentaire de nombreux peuples autochtones a travers le monde. En effet, en raison de facteurs geographiques, economiques et culturels, de nombreux peuples autochtones comptent toujours de maniere significative sur leur environnement naturel, afin de satisfaire une partie de leurs besoins culturels, spirituels et materiels, y compris alimentaires La poursuite de leur mode de vie se trouve aujourd’hui compromise par les effets nefastes des nombreux problemes environnementaux resultant notamment de la pollution industrielle. En revanche, il faut savoir que les peuples autochtones ne participent que marginalement aux activites polluantes et aux benefices economiques qui en decoulent. Ces propos revelent les rapports etroits entre la securite alimentaire des peuples autochtones et le discours du mouvement social de la justice environnementale. Ces considerations nous amenent a proposer quelques pistes de reflexion sur les limites et les possibilites du droit international, dans la perspective de minimiser les impacts disproportionnes qu’exercent les problemes environnementaux globaux sur la securite alimentaire des Inuits. Nous affirmons que tant la securite alimentaire que la justice environnementale requierent que les Inuits participent de facon reelle et effective aux processus decisionnels susceptibles d’affecter leurs interets environnementaux, y compris a l’echelle international.English Abstract: In recent decades, the deterioration of the quality of the environment has emerged as the most serious threat to the food security of many indigenous peoples around the world. Indeed, due to geographical, economic and cultural factors, many indigenous people still rely significantly on their natural environment to meet part of their cultural, spiritual and material needs, including alimentation. Pursuing their way of life is now threatened by the harmful effects of many environmental problems resulting in particular from industrial pollution. However, we must know that indigenous peoples participate only marginally to polluting activities and the economic benefits ensuing. These comments reveal the close relationship between food security of indigenous peoples and the perspective of the social movement for environmental justice. These considerations enable us to offer some reflections on the limits and possibilities of international law, from the perspective of minimizing the impact exercised by disproportionate global environmental problems on food security of Inuit. We maintain that both food security and environmental justice require that the Inuit participate in a real and effective way to decision-making which may affect their environmental interests, including at the international level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".