MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288752859

Riel's Defence: Perspectives on His Speeches

2015· article· en· W2288752859 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Adam Gaudry

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisIndigenousOpposition (politics)HistoryLawSociologyMedia studiesPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hans V. Hansen ed., Defence: Perspectives on His Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2014. 336 pages. ISBN 978-0-7735-4336-2. $32.95 paperback.Riel's Defence, Hans V. Hansen's edited collection examining two trial speeches at his 1885 treason trial is a comprehensive, albeit at times repetitive volume. While it provides some novel interpretations of trial, the book ultimately suffers from the underrepresentation of Metis analysis and perspective.Riel's speeches are quite fascinating historical documents in their own right. The speeches were made against his lawyers' wishes and presented the legal defence he instructed his lawyers to prepare, but ultimately did not receive. In these two speeches, Riel asserted his sanity, contested Canada's claim of ownership over the still-indigenous prairies, and expressed the Metis right of self-determination even if overpowered by Canadian troops. speeches also represent one of the most detailed defences of his life's work, his opposition to Canadian colonization of his people, and an alternative vision for what would become Western Canada. These speeches, then, are important not just for Indigenous studies scholars and students as well as Metis interested in their own history, but for making sense of Canada's colonization of the prairies following the multiple Indigenous resistances of 1885.Indeed, the speeches that comprise the first section of the book are a welcome re-boot to traditional sources on trial. Hansen's skillful editing of these speeches is the result of a self-conscious attempt to provide charity in reconstruction. (21) In previous reproductions of the text, editors had lumped together different trains of thought in the same paragraph leading many scholars and popular historians to treat trial speeches like the ramblings of a disorganized and incoherent speaker. (21) Since, as Hansen notes, sanity was repeatedly questioned both at his trial and often still by contemporary scholars, judicious editing with an eye to a more ideal presentation of the texts allows for a more accessible and preferable reading.The articles, unfortunately, do not possess the same level of coherence. While the legal and rhetorical elements are given significant attention, the near total absence of Metis voices is very obvious from the outset. In this regard the volume does seem to reflect an older era where scholarly discussions on Indigenous did not always involve Indigenous people.In fact, there is only one Metis-authored article in the collection, Kerry Sloan's 'A New German-Indian World' in the North-West: A Metis Deconstruction of the Rhetoric of Immigration in Louis Trial Speeches. Sloan herself expresses awareness of the lack of Indig- enous writing on the origin of political program in Indigenous thought, arguing that the scholarly reluctance to acknowledge the fact that Riel's religious and political thought was influenced by Indigenous philosophies stems from the apparent lack of primary sources on the subject and consequent difficulties in 'proving' such claims. (182) Sloan's analysis of vision of settler immigration on the prairies is both sophisticated and tender, struggling to appreciate the very real threat faced by Metis in lifetime in numerous dream-like asides in which Sloan herself engages with ghost. Alternating between Borrows-esque dreams and detailed political analysis, Sloan is cognizant of weakened political position at his trial, but simultaneously aware of the need for him to protect his people's prosperity and political independence even after his capture - his much-touted prophetic mission, after all. Sloan sees his trial speeches as a defence of Metis landholdings and self-determination in an increasingly Canadian west.Unlike many other scholars in the volume, Sloan situates this defence not in eastern education, but rather Indigenous political thought. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207