MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288763758 · doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:513

Researches Concerning the Main Characteristics of Dahlia Cultivars Type Decorative Under

2008· article· en· W2288763758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Cantor, Erzsébet Buta, L. Chiş

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDahliaCultivarBiologyHorticultureGeographyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some two hundred years ago the first Dahlia arrived in Western Europe from its native habitat in Mexico. Nowadays, it is difficult to find this original Dahlia among the current Dahlia assortment as flower enthusiasts and growers have done much in the way of developing new types, shapes and colours. Together with gladioli, lilies and begonias, the dahlias are one of the most important and popular summer-flowering bulbs. Dahlias are widely cultivated due to the huge range of colours and flower types available, its many uses, and fairly easy cultivation. In recent years many new cultivars have been created and thousands of Dahlia cultivars have been introduced into the world of gardening. Although a plant of the tropics, most cultivars have been developed in temperate climates and are easy to grow in most countries. At University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania researching activity for diversification of floral plants assortment by introducing of the most competitive foreign floral cultivars is one of the objectives. This paper describes 9 new Dahlia hybridus cultivars – Decorative type, with commercial origin: Sultane, Arabian Night, Vancouver, Smokey, Gloire Van Heemstede, Lilac Time, White Perfection, Bahama Yellow, Gloire Van Noordwijk. These where observed in our Transylvanian behaviors and recorded for the following morphological characteristics: blooming time, colour of flowers, plant height, and circumference of plant, number of stems, number of flower, flower diameters and number of ligules. The data were statistically computed by means of analysis of variance-LSD test to illustrate the significance of differences among studied cultivars. The cultivars studied have a rich range of flower colours (white, dark red, pink purple with striped, light yellow, orange, move, with lines or striped of different colours. Cultivars growing between 65 cm (Durban) to 109 cm (Pretoria) with different number of florets per inflorescence and have good health. The most representative Dahlia cultivars can be used for landscape design. Dahlias are absolutely perfect for borders often combined with annual plants; most of them also excel due to their extremely long flowering period. Dahlia also can be used as cut flowers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationFrench-language works237,207