MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288838346 · doi:10.1353/mlt.2015.0006

Death and the “Paradice within” in Paradise Lost and Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake

2015· article· en· W2288838346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lara Dodds

Bibliographic record

VenueMilton Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFantasyParadiseOryxMythologyLiteratureDystopiaArtArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Death and the "Paradice within" in Paradise Lost and Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake Lara Dodds In their introduction to Milton in Popular Culture, Laura Lunger Knoppers and Gregory Semenza suggest that it is the sublimity of Paradise Lost that accounts for Milton's influence on fantasy and science fiction. Writers of science fiction (SF) have been inspired by the epic's "otherwordly settings, grand conflicts of good and evil, heroes who determine the fate of their worlds, space travel, warfare, [and] futuristic visions."1 Science fiction has become the generic repository for the marvels and wonders that were once the domain of the epic.2 In addition to the sublime, however, there is a second line of descent from Milton's Paradise Lost to contemporary SF. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, the first science fictional rewriting of Paradise Lost, focuses not on the otherworldly spectacle of Paradise Lost but on the ethical dilemmas of creation.3 As early as the seventeenth century, proto-science fictional works became vehicles for rethinking the myth of the Fall, and SF continues to offer a generic home for the rewriting of the Fall myth.4 In this essay I show how Margaret Atwood's 2003 dystopian novel, Oryx and Crake, fits into this tradition. Milton's version of the [End Page 115] myth of the Fall has been definitive for English-language literature, yet the epic's substantial legacy in science fiction suggests that Paradise Lost has also provided material for the rewriting of this myth in new forms and to alternate ends. Oryx and Crake is the eleventh novel by the prolific and award-winning Canadian author Margaret Atwood, and her third that might be labeled science fiction. Oryx and Crake, like Atwood's 1985 dystopian novel The Handmaid's Tale, uses the estranging techniques characteristic of SF to diagnose and critique the dangers of the contemporary political climate.5 In each case, Atwood creates a near-future fictional world in which the consequences of current cultural and technological trends—religious fundamentalism and nuclear radiation in The Handmaid's Tale, human-made climate change in Oryx and Crake—can be explored through extrapolation. Atwood is not primarily a genre author, and she has frequently distanced her work from science fiction, preferring the term "speculative fiction." Atwood distinguishes between the two based upon the degree of invention that each permits. Speculative fiction, she maintains, includes no impossibilities, "no intergalactic space travel, no teleportation, no Martians." Atwood believes that her novels differ from science fiction because they invent "nothing we haven't already invented or started to invent." Atwood therefore defines Oryx and Crake as an extended game of what if: "what if we continue on the road we're already on? How slippery is the slope?"6 As I demonstrate in this essay, Oryx and Crake explores the possibility of environmental catastrophe—including the collapse of human civilization and its potential for rebirth—through an extensive engagement with the Fall myth, which is also a story of origins and of catastrophe. Previous to Oryx and Crake, Atwood's most prominent allusion to Milton's poetry appears in The Handmaid's Tale, where Milton's reflection on the parable of the talents in "When I consider how my light is spent" becomes part of the protagonist's indoctrination into coerced reproductive labor.7 Milton's poem (and by extension Milton) is aligned with the oppressive patriarchal authority that the novel details so terrifyingly: "They also serve who only [End Page 116] stand and wait, said Aunt Lydia. She made us memorize it. She also said, Not all of you will make it through. Some of you will fall on dry ground or thorns. Some of you are shallow-rooted."8 Offred remembers the line from Milton's sonnet, which is more threat than promise, during her ordeal as a Handmaid, and the allusion initiates the novel's nuanced exploration of the possibilities of passive and active resistance. In Oryx and Crake Milton's poetry appears in a more positive context, but here, also, a key line from the Miltonic canon signals Atwood's reworking of some of Milton's most characteristic concerns. Scholars have...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMilton StudiesSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207