MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288916761 · doi:10.1142/s1758825116500125

Temperature Effect on Dynamic Behaviors of Cis-Polyisoprene Chain

2016· article· en· W2288916761 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Weipeng Hu, Zichen Deng, Tingting Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Mechanics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of SurreyUniversity of British ColumbiaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChain (unit)Symplectic geometryGlass transitionBackflowGaussianFlow (mathematics)Statistical physicsMathematicsMaterials sciencePhysicsMechanicsComputer sciencePolymerMathematical analysisChemistryComputational chemistryMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel structure-preserving method, named as stochastic generalized multi-symplectic method, is proposed to analyze the temperature effect on the dynamic characteristics hided in the motion of the cis-polyisoprene chain in this paper. Ignoring the dynamic backflow and the exhaust volume effect, the motion of the Gaussian chain in linear polymers can be described as the Langevin model, which can be written into the stochastic generalized multi-symplectic form. For this stochastic generalized multi-symplectic form, a box structure-preserving scheme is constructed to simulate the motion of the cis-polyisoprene chain. From the simulation results, the temperature effects on the dynamic behaviors around the glass transition temperature and the viscous flow temperature of cis-polyisoprene are investigated. The structure-preserving method for analyzing the temperature effect on the dynamic characteristics of the cis-polyisoprene chain presented in this paper proposes a new way to study some dynamic characteristics of complex fluid systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied MechanicsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207