MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of downstream events of human Pax‐5B signalling in B lymphocytes

2008· article· en· W2289031364 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mélanie Bédard, Rodney J. Ouellette, Gilles A. Robichaud

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsAtlantic Cancer Research InstituteUniversité de Moncton
FundersNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsBiologyTranscription factorCarcinogenesisCancer researchLeukemiaApoptosisHaematopoiesisSignallingCell biologyGeneImmunologyGeneticsStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pax‐5 gene, which codes for a potent transcription factor named BSAP, plays an important role in B lymphocyte development and oncogenesis. Aberrant expression of Pax‐5 has been associated with different cancer such as lymphomas, leukemia and testicular cancer. Under the control of two alternative promoters, Pax‐5 can simultaneously express two different forms (i.e. Pax‐5A and Pax‐5B). Through the use of a ribozyme‐based gene suppression system, we demonstrate that Pax‐5B is an important factor in the regulation of intracellular signalling cascades and elements leading to modulation of biological processes such as cellular proliferation, survival and apoptosis. More specifically, this study characterizes the implication of the hPD‐1 receptor, Bax/Bcl2 ratios and p53 in Pax‐5B‐mediated apoptosis. These findings bring new insight into autoimmune diseases and cancer processes in human B lymphocytes. Research support from New Brunswick Innovation Foundation and Canadian Institutes in Health Research and Atlantic Innovation Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207