MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2289139180 · doi:10.14288/1.0099359

Characterization of libid-based DNA delivery systems

2009· article· en· W2289139180 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth W.C. Mok

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is focused on characterizing two lipid-based gene delivery systems: plasmid DNA-cationic lipid "complexes" and stabilized plasmid-lipid particles (SPLP). Complexes have utility for gene transfer in vitro whereas SPLP are designed for systemic gene therapy applications in vivo. In Chapter 2, the structural and fusogenic properties of complexes formed by mixing pCMV5 plasmid DNA with large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) composed of the cationic lipid N-[2,3-(dioleyloxy)propyl]- N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (DOTMA) and l,2-dioleoyl-3-phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) or l,2-dioleoyl-3- phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) are examined and correlated with transfection potency. It is shown, employing lipid mixing fusion assays, that pCMV5 plasmid strongly promotes fusion between these cationic vesicles. Freeze fracture electron microscopy studies demonstrate association of cationic vesicles to form clusters at low pCMV5 content, whereas macroscopic fused aggregates can be observed at higher plasmid levels. ³¹P NMR studies on the fused DNA-DOTMA/DOPE (1:1) complexes obtained at high plasmid levels (charge ratio 1.0) reveal narrow "isotropic" ³¹P NMR resonances, whereas the corresponding DOPC containing systems exhibit much broader "bilayer" ³¹P NMR spectra. In agreement with previous studies, the transfection potency of the DOPE containing systems is dramatically higher than for the DOPC containing complexes, indicating a correlation between transfection potential and the motional properties of endogenous lipids. It is suggested that the ³¹P NMR characteristics of complexes lipid structures, which may play a direct role in the fusion or membrane destabilization events vital to transfection. In Chapter 3, the influence of variations in the lipid component of SPLP on plasmid trapping and transfection potency in vitro are characterized. It is shown that SPLP formed with different monovalent cationic lipids exhibit similar plasmid entrapment properties but different transfection potencies. The poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) density in SPLP can substantially influence both SPLP formation and transfection. By decreasing the length of the fatty acyl component of the PEG-ceramide anchor from 20 to 14 to 8 carbons, or by using smaller PEG chains (PEG₇₅₀, PEG₂₀₀₀ as compared with PEG₅₀₀₀), higher transfection levels were observed, consistent with a requirement for PEG removal in order for efficient transfection to occur. Further, it is shown that the primary factor limiting the transfection potency of SPLP is association and uptake into target cells. The final set of experiments in Chapter 4 was focused on characterizing the influence of the plasmid component in the formation of SPLP. It is shown that encapsulation efficiencies remain at 50 % or higher for (initial) plasmid-to-lipid ratios of up to 70 μg/μmol, allowing the proportion of lipid in empty vesicles following detergent dialysis to be significantly reduced compared to previous protocols. In addition, it is shown that the encapsulation efficiency is sensitive to the conformation of the plasmid employed, where higher encapsulation is observed for linearized plasmid as compared to plasmid in supercoiled or relaxed circular conformations. However, lower transfection potency for linearized plasmid was observed in SPLP and plasmid DNA-cationic lipid complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→