MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289161396 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2015.7421289

Mitigation of fiber linear and nonlinear effects in coherent optical communication systems

2015· article· en· W2289161396 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaojun Liang, Jing Shao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber-optic communicationOptical fiberCompensation (psychology)Nonlinear systemMulti-mode optical fiberDispersion-shifted fiberDispersion (optics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceOpticsPolarization-maintaining optical fiberGraded-index fiberOptical cross-connectTransmission systemFiber optic splitterOptical performance monitoringOptical communicationSIGNAL (programming language)Transmission (telecommunications)Fiber optic sensorPlastic optical fiberTelecommunicationsPhysicsWavelength-division multiplexingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber dispersive and nonlinear effects lead to signal distortions in a fiber optic link, which limits the transmission performance and system capacity. Digital and optical techniques have been proposed to mitigate propagation impairments. In this paper, we give a brief review of digital and optical nonlinear compensation techniques. Then, we present our recent results on three techniques: perturbation-based digital compensation, correlated digital back propagation (DBP), and optical back propagation (OBP). The OBP scheme using dispersion-decreasing fiber is successfully applied to a fiber optic system with mesh configuration and showed 9.8 dB Q-factor gains as compared with the conventional DBP scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207