MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289181119 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2015.7402315

Continuous-time distributed convex optimization on time-varying directed networks

2015· article· en· W2289181119 on OpenAlexaff
Behrouz Touri, Bahman Gharesifard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBounded functionErgodic theoryMathematicsSequence (biology)Exponential growthConvex optimizationExponential stabilityDirected graphDifferentiable functionRegular polygonApplied mathematicsNonlinear systemDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a general class of continuous-time distributed control systems, where the control input to the dynamics of each agent relies on an observer that estimates the average state. The dynamics of these observers are nonlinear, but the agents only need to have access to local information to implement them. We show that under a general condition on the structure of the underlying time-varying directed graphs, the difference of the agents' estimates and the true average is upper bounded. Using this result, we show that when we have a class P* weakly exponentially ergodic flow and the agent's objective functions are differentiable with bounded gradients, any trajectory of the proposed continuous-time dynamics is globally asymptotically convergent to a minimizer. Finally, we demonstrate that the class P* weakly exponentially ergodic flow property can be achieved by assuming that the sequence of Laplacians are measurable, cut-balanced, and has a minimum instantaneous flow. As a by-product, we show that the proposed continuous-time dynamics for distributed convex optimization is convergent on any sequence of time-varying strongly connected directed graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207