MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289194323 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417760

Mobile Virtual Network Admission Control and Resource Allocation for Wireless Network Virtualization: A Robust Optimization Approach

2015· article· en· W2289194323 on OpenAlexafffund
Chengchao Liang, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceAdmission controlComputer networkQuality of serviceWireless networkResource allocationCall Admission ControlVirtualizationDistributed computingNetwork virtualizationWirelessCloud computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless network virtualization is a promising technology in next generation wireless networks. In this paper, motivated by the experience of user equipment (UE) admission control in traditional wireless networks, we propose a novel concept of mobile virtual network (MVN) admission control for wireless virtualization. By limiting the number of MVNs embedded in the physical network, MVN admission control can effectively guarantee quality of service (QoS) experienced by users of MVNs and maximize the utilization of the physical networks at the same time. Specifically, we propose a two-stage MVN embedding mechanism that can decouple short-term physical resource allocation from long-term admission control and resource leasing. With recent advances in robust optimization, we formulate the MVN admission control problem as a robust optimization problem. Both the long-term admission control and short- term resource allocation problems are transformed to convex problems, which can be solved efficiently. Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207