MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289278737 · doi:10.1177/026248930001900401

Layered Foams: A New Class of Cellular Polymers

2000· article· en· W2289278737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Polymers · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolymerClass (philosophy)Polymer scienceComposite materialChemical engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel process is described for making integral multilayered polymers with the layers separated by discontinuous narrow gaps containing air and/or a blowing agent. The two step process involves first introducing a low degree of entanglement among some of the polymer chains and then breaking apart these entanglements using a blowing agent to give the discontinuous gaps that resemble elongated, narrow cells. The layer density can be controlled within a wide range, typically 10 to 2000 layers/mm, while the gap between the layers is < 100 nanometers. These layered materials, called nanolayered polymers or layered foams, are mechanically strong and have excellent thermal and electrical, and, possibly, sound insulation properties. The nanolayering process is complimentary to the process described recently (Handa and Zhang, Cellular Polymers 19, (2000) 1) to make microlayered polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it