MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Postnatal development of ATP signaling involved in respiratory response to hypoxia in rats.

2010· article· en· W2289490170 on OpenAlexaff
Lalah Niane, David F. Donnelly, Vincent Joseph, Aïda Bairam

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuraminHypoxic ventilatory responseCarotid bodyHypoxia (environmental)Internal medicineEndocrinologyReceptorTidal volumeRespiratory systemStimulationPlethysmographAntagonistRespirationBiologyChemistryMedicineAnatomyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In adults, ATP, acting through P2X receptors, plays an important role in both carotid body excitation and brainstem respiratory stimulation during hypoxia. In this study, we addressed whether the contributions of P2X receptors undergo developmental changes in newborn, during which the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) matures. Using whole body plethysmography, HVR was measured in rats at 1, 4, 7, 12 and 21 postnatal days before and after intraperitoneal injection of suramin (P2X receptor antagonist, 40mg/kg) or vehicle. At each age, suramin reduced breathing frequency but not tidal volume (p<0.05, suramin vs vehicule group). The reduction in frequency was age dependent with greater effect at older ages (p<0.05). Using single‐unit recordings of carotid body activity, in vitro, suramin depressed discharge activity in both normoxia (150 torr PO2) and hypoxia (60 torr PO2), but the magnitude of depression was not age dependent. We conclude that ATP acting through P2X receptors plays an important role, both peripherally and centrally, in the HVR and this undergoes a developmental increase in the newborn period. These developmental changes primarily occur centrally. Founded PF‐RSR du FRSQ, IRSC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→