MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289523020 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2015.7409098

Parameter identification from SSFR tests and d-q model validation of synchronous generator

2015· article· en· W2289523020 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphanie Rakotovololona, Maxim Bergeron, J. Cros, P. Viarouge

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductancePermanent magnet synchronous generatorControl theory (sociology)LinearizationMATLABEquivalent circuitComputer scienceElectromagnetic coilSaturation (graph theory)Electronic engineeringEngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringMathematicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a fast parameter identification technique for a two-order d-q model of a synchronous generator from Standstill Frequency Response (SSFR) tests. This identification method is based on a modified SSFR test and the curves of the no-load and sustained short-circuit tests. This allows the lowest SSFR frequency to be 0.01Hz instead of 0.001Hz. The phase and field resistances are measured from fast and precise DC tests during the SSFR test. In this work, the value of the unsaturated synchronous inductance is defined from the no-load air gap linearization and the short-circuit saturation curve. This definition fits better when the saturation is considered and we present how to implement this approach with the Matlab-Simulink SimPowerSystem standard d-q models. Validations are made using sudden short-circuit tests at nominal field current to evaluate d-q model performances with magnetic saturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207