Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Conflict and Resolution. Conflict is a result of interaction between two parties. Conflict is perceived as negative element because it can create incovenients to the parties involved and three parties as well. However, it exist the benefits of conflict since it can lead an improvement. Conflict which naturally produce bad effect can function positively as to strengthen solidarity within the group and to stimulate the members of society in giving their contribution and open the communication between the members of the group.Key Words: conflicts, social interaction and dialectical process Abstrak: Konflik dan Resolusi. Konflik merupakan sebuah konsekuensi logis dari sebuah interaksi di antara dua pihak. Dalam kehidupan sosial manusia di mana saja dan kapan saja, tidak pernah lepas dari suatu konflik. Konflik sering dianggap negatif karena merugikan semua pihak baik yang bertikai maupun pihak di sekelilingnya. Tetapi konflik juga memiliki ruh atau spirit untuk melakukan perubahan yang lebih baik, karena kehidupan adalah proses dialektis. Konflik yang sejatinya berimplikasi buruk dapat berfungsi positif seperti diantaranya dapat memperkuat solidaritas kelompok yang agak longgar, dapat menyebabkan anggota masyarakat yang terisolasi menjadi turut berperan aktif, selain dapat dijadikan sebagai fungsi komunikasi antar anggota kelompok.Kata Kunci: Konflik, interaksi sosial, dan proses dialektis DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v2i1.2236
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it