MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289731940 · doi:10.14288/1.0101782

Cell division in a temperature-sensitive mutant of Escherichia coli

2011· article· en· W2289731940 on OpenAlexaff
John N. Reeve

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscherichia coliMutantCell divisionDivision (mathematics)Escherichia coli ProteinsCell biologyChemistryBiologyGeneticsCellGeneMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A temperature-sensitive division mutant, Escherichia coli BUG-6, has been investigated. This organism divides normally when grown at 30 C but fails to divide at 42 C. Growth continues at 42 C to produce very long, multinucleate filamentous cells. When returned to 30 C, or a high osmotic environment is added at 42 C, the filamentous cells divide rapidly to produce cells of normal size. The kinetics of cell division of the filaments at 30 C depends on the period at 42 C. During filament formation, DNA, RNA and protein synthesis continue as measured by radio-isotopic incorporation and chemical cell fractionation. DNA segregation occurs as shown by autoradiography. The rapid division of filaments replaced at 30 C cannot be prevented by novobiocin or cycloserine but is prevented by vancomycin and penicillin suggesting that de novo synthesis of cell wall precursors is not required for division but that positioning and cross-linking of the precursors is required. Filaments growing at 42 C were treated with nalidixic acid for different lengths of time. On returning these filaments to 30 C in nalidixic acid the number of divisions was proportional to the length of time at 42 C in the absence of nalidixic acid, ie. proportional to the amount of DNA synthesized at 42 C. Inhibition of protein synthesis, by chloramphenicol, does not prevent the division of filaments on replacing at 30 C provided that the period of filamentation at 42 C was greater than 6 minutes and less than 110 minutes. The maximum amount of division in the absence of protein synthesis occurred after a longer lag and slower than in non-inhibited control cultures. If protein synthesis was inhibited in filaments at 42 C the ability of such treated cells to divide at 30 C was rapidly lost. This loss of 'division potential’ has a half-life of about 0.5 minutes, ie. 0.5 minutes of protein inhibition at 42 C reduces the subsequent division at 30 C by 50%. The normal presence of 'division potential', therefore requires the synthetic doubling rate to be in excess of 0.5 minutes. Very short periods at 42 C indicate that 10 minutes incubation at 42 C is required to produce this extremely fast synthetic rate. A model for the production and expression of 'division potential' is presented. A biochemical analysis of the cell envelope of the filamentous cells and of normally dividing cells is presented. The major phospholipid compositions are the same. However, the fatty acid contents differ especially with regard to the cyclic fatty acids. When the filaments are allowed to divide by replacing at 30 C their fatty acid composition very rapidly reverts to that of normally dividing cells. The rates of individual phospholipid syntheses appear to change during the rapid cell division phase, however this may be an artifact resulting from an overall increase in the rate of phospholipid synthesis during this period. An analysis of the proteins within the cell envelope by radio-active double labelling techniques and followed by gel electrophoresis indicates that a protein(s) of molecular weight 80,000 - 90,000 exists in the envelope of filamentous cells which is not in the envelope of normal cells or is made at a much slower rate in normal cells. The protein is not incorporated into septa during the division of filaments at 30 C and little turnover occurs in the major proteins synthesized at 42 C when these cells are placed at 30 C. The possibility exists, however, that this protein is a product of filamentation and not the temperature sensitive gene product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207