MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289837893 · doi:10.1109/robio.2015.7418981

Base frame calibration for multi-robot coordinated systems

2015· article· en· W2289837893 on OpenAlexaff
Huajian Deng, Hongmin Wu, Yang Cao, Yisheng Guan, Hong Zhang, Jianling Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotRobot calibrationComputer scienceFrame (networking)CalibrationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionProcess (computing)Base (topology)Robot kinematicsRoboticsSoftwareMobile robotMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well-known that industrial robots are not very accurate. Robot calibration, which is one of the key techniques in robot off-line programming (OLP) as well as in robotics, is very helpful to increase the accuracy of robot motion. To solve the problem of base frame calibration for coordinated multi-robot systems, this paper proposes a simple and practical method, which is improved by three points calibration. It determines the base frame relationship for multi-robot systems. With laser sensors and a buzzer, the degree of accuracy has been enhanced. In order to integrate the process and the algorithm of the calibration method, a software has been developed. Experiment results have verified the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207