MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289914242 · doi:10.1089/vor.2015.0292

Laparoscopic Revision of Banded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: Pouch Resizing and Redo of Gastrojejunal Anastomosis for Ring Migration and Pouch Dilation

2016· article· en· W2289914242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Flávio Kawamoto, Dênis Pajecki, Henrique Dameto Giroud Joaquim, Daniel RICCIOPPO, Ernesto Sasaki Imakuma, Rodrigo Macacari, Marco Aurélio Santo

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoscopy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePouchSurgeryRoux-en-Y anastomosisAnastomosisWeight lossGastroenterostomyStenosisVomitingGastric bypassGastrectomyInternal medicineObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a surgical procedure to induce and maintain weight loss. It was first reported for the treatment of obesity in 1967.1 Since then, this surgery has undergone many modifications, such as the placement of a silastic ring around the gastroenterostomy site.2 This procedure, known as banded RYGB, was performed to restrict the rate of emptying of the pouch. Some patients develop serious ring-related complications, such as nausea, vomiting, regurgitation, and even malnutrition, requiring revision of their bariatric operation.3 The stenosis due to the ring migration leads to gastric pouch dilation and weight regain after distal obstruction resolution. A pouch resizing may be necessary to prevent obesity relapse. We present a video of a revisional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of ring migration with gastric pouch dilation. Materials and Methods: A 48-year-old female with hypertension and type 2 diabetes underwent open-banded RYGB in 2007. The maximum weight was 119 kg (body mass index [BMI] = 44 kg/m2). The patient remained with stable weight until 2012. After 5 years of surgery, the patient weighed 62.1 kg (BMI = 23 kg/m2) with complete resolution of hypertension and diabetes. However, the patient started presenting gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, postprandial vomiting, and progressive weight loss. Seven years after surgery, the patient weighed 55 kg (BMI = 20.7 kg/m2). The patient was subjected to investigation. Endoscopy revealed Los Angeles grade C esophagitis and stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis, upper gastrointestinal contrast study demonstrated ring migration, and computed tomography showed pouch volumetry of 110 mL. The patient underwent multiple upper endoscopies with dilations without substantive relief of symptoms. Laparoscopic approach was performed with gastrojejunostomy resection along with the ring, pouch resizing, and redo of gastrojejunal anastomosis within a 210 minutes procedure. Results: The postoperative period was uneventful. The patient started with fasting at postoperative day 1, presented good liquid diet acceptance, and had hospital discharged 4 days after surgery. No early complication was observed. After 2 years, the patient is without gastroesophageal reflux and no weight regain. Conclusion: Ring migration along with pouch dilation after banded RYGB can be safely managed through laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy resection and pouch resizing with immediate and long-term symptomatic improvement. This video was presented at the IFSO Congress 2014 in Montreal, Canada. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 4 mins 58 secs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoscopySame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207