MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289934327

SIPP Policy Dialogue Number 6 April 2003

2003· article· en· W2289934327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Geisbauer, Raymond B. Blake, Janice Stokes, Pavel Peykov, Erna Pearson, John Allan, JOHN WHYTE, Beth Bilson, Robert Wardhaugh, Joyce Green, Lynn Oliver

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Justice Community Gathers to Discuss Change 1; Director’s Notes 2; Stimulating Public-Policy Discussion and Debate, Publications, and Still Ahead This Year 3; Bringing the University of Saskatchewan to SIPP 4; The 2003-04 Senior Fellowships 4; Demographics and the Changing Face of Saskatchewan 5; SIPP’s Relationship with the Students of the University of Regina 6; Upcoming Public-Policy Paper Reviews Essential Services in SK 6; Special Article: Harold MacKay, Q.C. 7; Increasing Your Exposure within Saskatchewan’s Public-Policy Community 8;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0160.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207