MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2289963005 · doi:10.26443/mjm.v12i1.735

The effects of outdoor air pollution on chronic illnesses

2020· article· en· W2289963005 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Hong Chen, Mark S. Goldberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAir pollutionPollutionEnvironmental healthEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic diseases, especially cancer, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory diseases, are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide.In Canada alone, chronic diseases account for 87% of total disability and 89% of all deaths (1).It is estimated that half of the Canadian population live currently with a chronic illness and more than 90% of them have these three diseases (1).Chronic diseases develop typically over long periods of time and have multiple risk factors.The major causes of cardiovascular disease include high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and obesity (2-6).For lung cancer and respiratory disease, tobacco smoking and exposure to toxic chemicals are important risk factors (7-15).More recently, ambient air pollution has been implicated in increasing the incidence and mortality from lung cancer and from cardio-pulmonary diseases (16-19).Present-day urban air pollution comprises hundreds of substances, including sulphur dioxide, ozone, nitrogen oxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, particulate matter, rubber dust, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and many different volatile organic compounds.Particles are a heterogeneous mixture of solid and liquid droplets with wide distributions of size and mass.Coarse particles, greater than 2.5 µm in median aerodynamic diameter, derive from a variety of sources including windblown dust and grinding operations; fine particles are primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels (20).Common constituents of particulates include elemental and organic carbon, sulphates, nitrates, pollen, microbial contaminants, and metals (20).Fine particles can react with sulphur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen in the atmosphere to form strong acids, such as sulphuric acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and acid aerosols (20).In addition, urban air also contains benzene and 1,3butadiene that are considered carcinogenic (21).The health impact of outdoor air pollution became apparent during the smog episodes in London, England, (Figure 1) in the 1950s and in some other places.In London, the lethal fog, which occurred because a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Medicine→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→