MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289970055 · doi:10.17163/lgr.n4.2005.05

Utilización de bioensayos para la determinación de contaminación en agua de riego en la cuenca del río Granobles

2006· article· es· W2289970055 on OpenAlexaff
Rocío Contero, Orlando Felicita

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Granja · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resource Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratiotesPistiaBiologyHumanitiesBotanyHorticultureAquatic plantEcologyMacrophyteArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El uso de los bioensayos como indicadores del grado de afectación de una sustancia química en organismos vivos, ha sido manejado bajo condiciones controladas de laboratorio desde hace mucho tiempo; se ha trabajado con éxito en varios países latinoamericanos (Colombia, Chile, Argentina, Cuba y otros), especialmente utilizando cebolla de bulbo (Allium cepa), lechuga (Lactuca sativa), pulga de agua (Daphnia magna), algas (Hidra attenuata), arroz (Oriza sativa), repollito de agua (Pistia stratiotes), larva y adultos de Aedes aegypty, entre las principales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa GranjaSame topicWater Resource Management and QualityFrench-language works237,207