MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Peripheral nerve injury induces DOR trafficking to cell surface in dorsal horn neurons

2008· article· en· W2289985435 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah V. Holdridge, Catherine M. Cahill

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathic painAllodyniaHyperalgesiaNerve injuryAgonistNeuroscienceMedicineNociceptionOpioidAnalgesicChronic painPharmacologyChemistryReceptorAnesthesiaInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuropathic (NP) pain remains a significant challenge for clinicians as it is typically refractory to traditional analgesics. However, research in ours and other laboratories increasingly suggests a therapeutic role of delta opioid receptor (DOR) agonists in treating NP pain. Spinal administration of a selective DOR agonist, attenuated nerve injury‐induced allodynia and hyperalgesia with enhanced antinociceptive effects in NP rats compared with controls. This functional enhancement was not due to increased DOR biosynthesis, as DOR protein did not change. In the present study, we examined DOR subcellular localization by electron microscopy immunohistochemistry to determine whether NP injury produces a redistribution of DORs from internal stores to the cell surface. Quantification of immunopositive dendrites in the dorsal horn revealed a bilateral increase in plasma membrane‐associated DORs within lamina V neurons of NP rats compared to shams. The recruitment of DORs to neuronal plasma membranes may represent a compensatory mechanism by which neurons may sustain an inhibitory tone during chronic pain states, and in turn, indicate a viable drug target. (CIHR, J.P. Bickell Foundation, CFI/OIT, CRC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→