MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290098089 · doi:10.1149/2.0381606jes

Pit Transition Potential and Repassivation Potential of Stainless Steel in Thiosulfate Solution

2016· article· en· W2290098089 on OpenAlexaff
M. Zakeri, Masoumeh Naghizadeh, Davood Nakhaie, Mohammad Hadi Moayed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchFerdowsi University of Mashhad
KeywordsThiosulfateTransition metalMetallurgyChlorideChemistryElectrode potentialSodium thiosulfateMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryElectrodeElectrochemistrySulfurPhysical chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition potential and the repassivation potential of AISI type 316 stainless steel was investigated in the absence and the presence of 0.01 M thiosulfate in chloride containing media. The pencil electrode method was employed to explore the key factors affecting the pit transition potential and the repassivation potential in thiosulfate containing solution. Using this method the pit chemistry at various temperatures was also evaluated. A good correlation was found between the pitting potential and the pit transition potential at various temperatures. Moreover, there was a significant decrease in the repassivation potential by addition of 0.01 M thiosulfate. The results were in accordance with the theory suggesting that the chemistry of the pit governs the pit repassivation potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207