MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2290138897 · doi:10.1115/omae2015-41063

Analysis of Iceberg, Pack Ice, and Ocean Current Dynamics Offshore Newfoundland and Labrador From Satellite-Tracked Buoys During the 2014 Ice Season

2015· article· en· W2290138897 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ian Turnbull, Rocky Taylor, Robert Sarracino, Aaron Slaney, Laura C. Roche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research
FundersHibernia Management and Development Company
KeywordsIcebergSubmarine pipelineSea iceOceanographyContext (archaeology)Current (fluid)Drift iceIce shelfSatelliteGeologyEnvironmental scienceArctic ice packMeteorologyClimatologyCryosphereGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shipping operations along the coasts of Newfoundland and Labrador associated with Grand Banks oil and gas production, as well as mining operations in Labrador, may be exposed to potentially hazardous ice conditions. Possible future development of oil and gas reserves offshore Labrador will also be exposed to risk associated with iceberg and pack ice conditions. Improved understanding of the characteristics of ice dynamics and metocean forcing mechanisms behind them will lead to more efficient operational planning and safer operations. Accordingly, CARD has initiated a long-term project to collect and analyze data on the pack ice and iceberg dynamics in these regions. This paper presents an analysis of the drift of pack ice features and two icebergs tagged with satellite-tracked buoys during April-August and July-August 2014, and characterizes their drift in the context of the winds and currents driving their dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→