MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290190397 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2016.7418081

23.7 A 16Gb/s 1 IIR + 1 DT DFE compensating 28dB loss with edge-based adaptation converging in 5µs

2016· article· en· W2290190397 on OpenAlexaff
Shayan Shahramian, Behzad Dehlaghi, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responseComputer scienceBinary numberAlgorithmRobustness (evolution)Adaptation (eye)Control theory (sociology)Bandwidth (computing)Digital filterMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I/O receivers routinely equalize ISI over 10 or more post-cursor UI. IIR DFEs are a low-power technique for canceling long post-cursor ISI tails, and have been demonstrated compensating over 20dB loss at fbit/2 up to 10Gb/s [1-5]. Equalizer adaptation is required to maintain signal integrity in time-varying channel and circuit conditions. Robust adaptation algorithms suitable for discrete-time (DT) DFEs are well-established, but there are few examples of adaptive algorithms for IIR DFEs [2,4], each exhibiting relatively slow convergence, additional high-bandwidth hardware and/or requiring the input data statistics to meet specific criteria. In this work, a 16Gb/s IIR DFE is integrated into a CDR, and the adaptation algorithm makes use of signals available in a regular binary phase detector (PD) to simultaneously adapt the IIR and DT taps. The novel algorithm provides faster and more robust convergence than has been previously demonstrated for IIR DFEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207