MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290211375 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.13668

Cécilia Élimort, L’expérience missionnaire et le fait colonial en Martinique (1760-1790)

2015· article· fr· W2290211375 on OpenAlexaff
Manuel Covo

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMartiniqueColonialismArtHumanitiesWest indiesEthnologyGeographySociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À travers l'étude de l'expérience missionnaire en Martinique avant la Révolution, la jeune chercheuse Cécilia Élimort éclaire une dimension peu connue du fait colonial dans les Antilles françaises.Il s'agit d'un mémoire de master remanié et publié dans la collection guyanaise « Espaces outre-mer » de la maison Ibis Rouge Éditions.Bernard Gainot, qui a assuré la direction des recherches de Cécilia Élimort à l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, indique à juste titre dans sa préface que l'étude constitue un « jalon important » (p.14) dans la connaissance des sociétés coloniales antillaises.L'ouvrage se révèle en effet foisonnant et ouvre une multitude de pistes de réflexions.L'auteure offre non seulement une présentation institutionnelle de la présence ecclésiastique en Martinique, mais la resitue dans les dynamiques politiques, sociales et culturelles qui traversent l'empire français de la deuxième moitié du dix-huitième siècle.Cécilia Élimort, L'expérience missionnaire et le fait colonial en Martinique ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207