MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2290225734 · doi:10.7202/1034452ar

Le silence et le procès civil

2015· article· fr· W2290225734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sylvie Bernigaud

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLegal Systems and Institutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qu’il soit ou non le reflet d’une stratégie procédurale, le silence est valorisé lorsqu’il s’inscrit dans une optique respectueuse des droits de la défense et du principe du contradictoire. Le Code de procédure civile lui attribue une valeur fonctionnelle qui dépend à la fois de la maîtrise des parties sur le déroulement du procès et de la responsabilité du juge en matière juridictionnelle, concernant la régulation de l’instance. Accepté, toléré ou réprouvé, le silence n’est pas un, mais s’exprime de différentes manières dans le cadre du procès civil, ce qui rend aléatoire toute tentative d’intégration dans telle ou telle catégorie juridique. Il n’est pas pour autant l’expression d’une quelconque anarchie procédurale, la loi encadrant ses différentes manifestations et les effets juridiques qu’elles produisent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.051
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droit→Same topicLegal Systems and Institutions→French-language works237,207→