PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK MODEL GUIDED DISCOVERY DAN EFETIVITASNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMA NEGERI 1 BAYAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model guided discovery dan mengetahui efektivitasnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan terdiri dari Silabus, rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP), lembar kegiatan discovery siswa (LKDS), buku ajar siswa (BAS), tes penguasaan konsep (TPK), tes berpikir kreatif (TBK). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran menggunakan model 4D dari Tiagrajan, S. Semmel & Semmel yang terdiri dari empat tahap, yaitu tahap define, design, development dan disseminate. Perangkat pembelajaran dikembangkan pada materi sistem pernapasan, hasil pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran selanjutnya dianalisis menggunakan rumus presentase rata-rata dan disesuaikan dengan tabel kriteria validasi. Untuk mengetahui efektivitas perangkat pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa, perangkat pembelajaran di ujicoba pada kelompok terbatas di kelas XI IPA 1 dan kelas XI IPA 2 dengan jumlah siswa 47 orang, dan dianalisis menggunakan rumus presentase ketuntasan individu. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian ini antara lain; 1) perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan dikategorikan baik (valid) dan sangat baik (sangat valid) sehingga layak digunakan dalam proses pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 1 Bayan, 2) perangkat pembelajaran efektif dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Kata Kunci: Perangkat Pembelajaran, Pendekatan saintifik, Model guided discovery, Berpikir kreatifAbstract: The purposes of this research are to develop learning device based on scientific approach with guided discovery and to know the effectiveness of peripheral learning to ability of mastering biological concept and creative thinking ability of student. Learning device of developed study consist of Syllabus, plan execution of study, sheet activity of student discovery, book teach student, domination concept of tes, think creatively tes. Developing learning device uses 4D model from Tiagrajan, S. Semmel & Semmel which consist of four steps: difine, disaign, development, and disseminate. The results of developing peripheral learning analyzed using mean precentage criteria which adapted from criteria validation table. To know the effectiveness of the peripheral to mastery bioligical concept and creatively student think ability, the learning device was tested in class XI IPA 1 and class XI IPA 2 with total 47 students. The result was analyzed using percentage formula of individual mastery. In conclusion 1) the developed learning device was categorized good (valid) and very good (very valid) so that it can be used in learning processes in SMAN Bayan 2) the developed learning device is effective to improve the student’s creative thinking.Keywords: learning device, scientific approach, guided discovery, creative thinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".