L’affaire Simpson de 1967 : une rupture médiatique dans l’appréhension du dopage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est tiré d’une recherche portant sur « Éthique et dopage ». Le travail montre que la mort de Tom Simpson, durant le Tour de France de 1967, s’apparente à une véritable rupture dans la perception du dopage au travers des médias. Le décès d’un champion, lors de la course cycliste la plus célèbre du monde, en direct devant les caméras de télévision conduira à un glissement : d’un dopage festif, individualisé et inorganisé vers un dopage tragique, collectif et rationalisé. Enfin, le traitement journalistique de l’affaire révèle que, pour les agents détenteurs du pouvoir sportif, politique et médical, le dopage ne demeure qu’une affaire individuelle ; alors que pour les agents dépossédés dans le champ, le fléau s’érige en système, devient plus collectif et autorise donc une critique des instances dirigeantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".