MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2290358505 · doi:10.14288/1.0086160

Sexual maturation in sea- and freshwater phases of Pacific salmonids and investigations of reproductive hormone involvement in osmoregulatory adaptation

2008· article· en· W2290358505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jack L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)BiologyFisheryHormoneZoologyEcologyOceanographyEndocrinologyGeologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The changes in reproductive parameters and hormones, and blood sodium during the final weeks of sexual maturation in wild coastal salmon, chinook, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and steelhead, O. mykiss, were documented for stocks spawning in two similar river systems on the west coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Chinook were blood-sampled and sacrificed at intervals during migration from the ocean into brackish Nitinat Lake, through the completion of final maturation in Nitinat River, and at the post-spawning stage. Gonadosomatic index (GSI), hepatosomatic index (HSI), and oocyte germinal vesicle stage and hydration level were measured in sacrificed chinook and steelhead. Stamp River steelhead were serially sampled for blood during the month preceding and the month following final maturation. Blood samples were analysed by specific radioimmunoassay for gonadotropin (GtH), estradiol-17β (E₂), testosterone (T), 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT), and 17α,20β-dihydroxyprogesterone (17,20-P). Blood sodium was measured by flame photometry. GSI and hydration level of oocytes increased in females of both species between the earliest stages of maturation and ovulation. Patterns of hormone concentration were similar in chinook and steelhead, but the peaks in concentration of the steroids at each stage were much lower in steelhead. Concentrations of E₂ and T declined from initial levels to ovulation in females, while GtH and 17,20-P increased. In chinook males, T concentration peaked and declined before spermiation, while 11-KT was highest at spermiation, and declined thereafter. The concentration of 11-KT was higher than that of T in steelhead males at spermiation. Little change in GtH and 17,20-P concentration occurred in steelhead males, but these hormones increased in relation to onset of spermiation in chinook. Fertility was compared between chinook and chum salmon, O. keta, maturing in brackish and fresh water. Fertility was low in both brackish and freshwater chinook females at the beginning of the chinook migration, when salinity was high in Nitinat Lake. Blood sodium was higher in brackish water females, but there was no correlation between egg mortality and blood sodium at ovulation. Later in the season, as salinity in net pens decreased, chinook fertility increased. At the beginning of the chum migration season, when salinity was lowest, chinook fertility was equal to that of chum maturing at the same location. The relationship between plasma reproductive hormone concentration and the ability to osmoregulate in sea water was compared in post-spawning steelhead and coho salmon, O. kisutch, transferred from fresh water to brackish holding facilities. All hormones declined to low levels in steelhead while still in fresh water, within 3 weeks of spawning, but persisted at spawning levels for at least 6 weeks in coho. Steelhead blood sodium was stable in the range indicating osmoregulatory adaptation as salinity was increased to full sea water shortly after transfer. Coho blood sodium was higher in 2/3 sea water than that of steelhead in full sea water. High levels of reproductive hormones may interfere with the ability of salmonids to osmoregulate in sea water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species→French-language works237,207→