MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290360421

The Art of Losing: A Letter to My New Colleagues at Deerfield Academy

2016· article· en· W2290360421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carrie Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDigital Storytelling and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingPsychologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

members of the English department at Deerfield Academy in Massachusetts have a tradition of writing letters one another over the summer months, describing what they're reading and thinking and seeing, how they are enjoying the span of time between the end of one academic year and the start of the next. My husband and I joined the English department at Deerfield this fall, and we were invited participate. letter that follows tells my new colleagues what it was like in Virginia as we prepared leave Sweet Briar College, where we lived and taught for the last twenty-one years (though I had a three-year hiatus from Sweet Briar, during which I served as Distinguished Visiting Professor of Creative Writing at nearby Hollins University). In March, Sweet Briar College's administration and board, citing insurmountable financial difficulties, announced that the college would close at the end of the 2014-2015 academic year. In June, supporters and alumnae won a surprising victory, and the college will remain open for at least another year--perhaps for another hundred years. But the rescue came too late for many, such as my husband and myself, who had already found and accepted positions elsewhere. My letter my new colleagues describes the thoughts and feelings that accompanied our last days at Sweet Briar--the last time we did this or that, went here or there, saw one friend or another--days that also were filled with anticipation about the new life we were soon begin. June 15, 2015 Sweet Briar, Virginia Dear Friends, In every room here at Sanctuary Cottage we weave a path now through cardboard boxes, many gleaned from the liquor store (Barton Gin, Canadian Mist, Benchmark Kentucky Straight Bourbon ...). Most of these boxes are half-full, flaps open. Inside, books are stacked, blankets are folded--the red-and-blue woven bedspread from my grandfather's boyhood bed, for instance, and two quilts patterned with purple irises, sewn by my great-great-aunt. Plastic bins are stuffed with eiderdowns that release a flurry of feathers when I open the lids. We own a few pieces of silver--a candelabra, a child's cup engraved with the names of daughters going back six generations, ending with my own, a bowl given my parents on the occasion of their wedding, picture frames engraved with the names of each of our three children and the hour and date of their births, given us by the mother of a dear childhood friend. These frames--blackened with tarnish, evidence of my shameful neglect--I have polished and wrapped in flannel and packed. This fall, along with many of our friends and colleagues at Sweet Briar, we will move begin new jobs. Deerfield is a distinguished school, beautiful--we discovered when we visited--and buttressed by a comfortingly generous endowment. As every Deerfield faculty member and student likely knows, among the school's illustrious alumni is the writer John McPhee. I buy a copy of his book about the school's famous headmaster, Frank Boyden, who oversaw nearly every aspect of the school for an extraordinary sixty-six years, from 1902 until 1968. The object of the school should be the development of character, Boyden wrote in 1906, to help each pupil do that for which he is best suited. I like this sentiment. What better life than the life for which one is best suited? Yet the matter of determining exactly what sort of life is one in which one is most likely be happy and successful is complicated. We are apprehensive about our move, for instance, regretful about who and what we will miss when we depart, uncertain about the fate of the place we leave behind, as well as our future in the place which we have committed ourselves. campus of Deerfield is a less than a half hour's drive from the Vermont state border, thirty-eight miles from a house in the tiny Vermont town of Williamsville, where I lived happily for a few years as a child. I have the disconcerting sense of my present life inescapably approaching its beginning, and it occurs me wonder what happens when both ends of the circle meet. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0110.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicDigital Storytelling and EducationFrench-language works237,207