MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290370811 · doi:10.1109/tap.2015.2513420

MIMO Antennas Efficiency Measurement Using Wheeler Caps

2015· article· en· W2290370811 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Moharram, Ahmed A. Kishk

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOAntenna (radio)Computer scienceAntenna efficiency3G MIMOElectronic engineeringAcousticsRadiation patternPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple and reliable measurement-based procedure is proposed to predict the radiation efficiency of multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) antennas using Wheeler caps. Based on only measuring the S-parameters of the MIMO antenna system in free-space and inside a shielded Wheeler cap, the method approximately predicts the radiation efficiency of each uncoupled MIMO antenna port. The method makes use of the recently developed contactless Wheeler cap concept and the improved quality factor method to facilitate the processing of the results. The procedure is verified by comparing full-wave results with prediction through measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207