MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290447812

Structure and composition of forest edges created by a spruce budworm outbreak and maintained by moose browsing in Cape Breton Highlands National Park

2013· article· en· W2290447812 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Caroline M.A. Franklin

Bibliographic record

VenueSaint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpruce budwormCanopyGeographyTransectEcologyForest structureHabitatForestryPicea abiesWindthrowTaigaNational parkOld-growth forestSecondary forestBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaTortricidae
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structure and composition of forest edges created by a spruce budworm outbreak and maintained by moose browsing in Cape Breton Highlands National Park By Caroline FranklinNatural forest edges created by a severe spruce budworm outbreak in Cape Breton Highlands National Park, Nova Scotia, Canada, have been maintained three decades postdisturbance by moose browsing.My overall research objective was to determine the direct and indirect effects of edge creation on vegetation structure and composition.Trees, deadwood, and understorey plants were sampled along 120 m transects perpendicular to six forest edges.The spruce budworm-induced forest edges were characterized by narrow transition zones where canopy cover, stem density, and structural diversity were intermediate between the disturbed area and forest.Severe moose browsing appears to be preventing sapling growth and altering species composition, particularly on the insect disturbed side of the edge.If moose continue to maintain the forest edge, contrasts in vegetation structure and composition between the severely browsed disturbed area and adjacent intact forest could increase and ultimately alter forest edge function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)Same topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207