Endometriosis of Right Inguinal Subcutaneous Tissue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endometriosis is usually found in intrapelvic structures such as ovaries, pelvic peritoneum and Douglas pouch. We report an unusual case of endometriosis in the right inguinal region. A 45-year-old Japanese woman complained of pain and a mass in the right inguinal region, and her symptoms fluctuated with the menstrual cycle. A poorly defined and elastic hard mass was palpable in the right inguinal region. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed mass in front of the pubis measuring 2 × 1 cm at the lower edge of the rectus abdominis muscle. We performed an excisional biopsy and pathological diagnosis was endometriosis. After the operation, she was relieved from pain and did not show any recurrence at the latest follow-up 30 months after the surgery. In patients with an inguinal subcutaneous mass complaining of periodic change of symptoms, endometriosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Since endometriosis can show variable signals on MRI, histological examination including biopsy is mandatory. J Med Cases. 2016;7(3):98-101 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2428w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".