MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290622669 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417612

On Resource Allocation for Downlink Power Minimization in OFDMA Small Cells in a Cloud-RAN

2015· article· en· W2290622669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacrocellTelecommunications linkTransmitter power outputQuality of serviceComputer scienceC-RANRadio access networkComputer networkOptimization problemResource allocationOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessCloud computingPower controlCellular networkMathematical optimizationPower (physics)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingBase stationMathematicsTransmitterAlgorithmMobile station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of minimizing the total downlink transmit power in an orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA)-based cellular network composed of a single-antenna macrocell overlaid by multi-antenna small cells deployed in a cloud radio access network (C-RAN) architecture. More specifically, the C- RAN minimizes the total downlink transmit power subject to the quality of service (QoS) constraints for small cell user equipments (SUEs), power budgets of small cells, interference thresholds for macro UEs (MUEs), and practical fronthaul capacity constraints. This problem is a mixed integer nonlinear problem (MINLP). Moreover, the problem can become infeasible which necessitates the employment of some form of admission control (AC). Therefore, relying on the framework of successive convex approximation (SCA), we propose a low-complexity solution for the original non- convex MINLP by solving a series of convex problems, which is guaranteed to converge to a local optimum solution. Numerical results indicate the performance of the proposed formulation and demonstrate the underlying tradeoffs among the SUEs' QoS requirements, number of admitted SUEs, total downlink transmit power, and the available fronthaul capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it