MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2290666716 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.112005

Measurement of the forward–backward asymmetry of top-quark and antiquark pairs using the full CDF Run II data set

2016· article· en· W2290666716 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. Aaltonen, S. Amerio, D. Amidei, A. Anastassov, A. Annovi, J. Antoš, G. Apollinari, J. A. Appel, T. Arisawa, A. Artikov, J. Asaadi, W. Ashmanskas, B. Auerbach, A. Aurisano, F. Azfar, W. Badgett, T. Bae, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, V. E. Barnes, B. A. Barnett, P. Barria, P. Bartos, M. Bauce, F. Bedeschi, S. Behari, G. Bellettini, J. Bellinger, D. Benjamin, A. Beretvas, A. Bhatti, K. R. Bland, B. Blumenfeld, A. Bocci, A. Bodek, D. Bortoletto, J. Boudreau, A. Boveia, L. Brigliadori, C. Bromberg, E. Brücken, J. Budagov, H. S. Budd, K. Burkett, G. Busetto, P. Bussey, P. Butti, A. Buzatu, A. Calamba, S. Camarda, M. Campanelli, F. Canelli, B. Carls, D. Carlsmith, R. Carosi, S. Carrillo, B. Casal, M. Casarsa, A. Castro, P. Catastini, D. Cauz, V. Cavaliere, A. Cerri, Y. C. Chen, M. Chertok, G. Chiarelli, G. Chlachidze, K. Cho, D. Chokheli, A. Clark, C. Clarke, M. E. Convery, J. Conway, M. Corbo, M. Cordelli, C. A. Cox, D. J. Cox, M. Cremonesi, D. Cruz, J. Cuevas, R. Culbertson, N. d’Ascenzo, M. Datta, P. de Barbaro, L. Demortier, M. Deninno, M. d’Errico, F. Devoto, A. Di Canto, B. Di Ruzza, J. Dittmann, S. Donati, M. D’Onofrio, M. Dorigo, A. Driutti, K. Ebina, R. C. Edgar, R. Erbacher, S. Errede, B. Esham, S. M. Farrington, J. P. Fernández Ramos, R. D. Field, G. Flanagan, R. Forrest, M. Franklin, J. Freeman, H. Frisch, Y. Funakoshi, C. Galloni, A. F. Garfinkel, P. Garosi, H. Gerberich, E. Gerchtein, S. Giagu, V. Giakoumopoulou, K. Gibson, C. M. Ginsburg, N. Giokaris, P. Giromini, V. Glagolev, D. Glenzinski, M. Gold, D. Goldin, A. Golossanov, G. Gómez, G. Gomez Ceballos, M. Goncharov, O. González López, I. Gorelov, A. T. Goshaw, K. Goulianos, E. Gramellini, C. Grosso-Pilcher, J. Guimarães da Costa, S. R. Hahn, J. Han, F. Happacher, K. Hara, M. Hare, R. Harr, T. Harrington-Taber, K. Hatakeyama, C. P. Hays, J. J. Heinrich, M. Herndon, A. Höcker, Z. Hong, W. H. Hopkins, S. Hou, R. E. Hughes, U. Husemann, M. Hussein, J. Huston, G. Introzzi, M. Iori, A. Ivanov, E. James, D. Jang, B. Jayatilaka, E. J. Jeon, S. Jindariani, M. Jones, K. K. Joo, S. Y. Jun, T. R. Junk, M. Kambeitz, T. Kamon, P. E. Karchin, A. Kasmi, Y. Kato, W. Ketchum, J. Keung, B. Kilminster, D. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. E. Kim, M. J. Kim, S. H. Kim, S. B. Kim, Y. J. Kim, Y. K. Kim, N. Kimura, M. Kirby, K. Kondo, D. J. Kong, J. Konigsberg, A. V. Kotwal, M. Kreps, J. Kroll, M. Kruse, T. Kuhr, M. Kurata, A. T. Laasanen, S. Lammel, M. Lancaster, K. Lannon, G. Latino, H. S. Lee, S. Leo, S. Leone, J. D. Lewis, A. Limosani, E. Lipeles, A. Lister, Q. Liu, Tao Liu, S. Lockwitz, A. Loginov, D. Lucchesi, A. Lucà, J. Lueck, P. Lujan, P. Lukens, G. Lungu, J. Lys, R. Lysák, R. Madrak, P. Maestro, S. Malik, G. Manca, A. Manousakis-Katsikakis, L. Marchese, F. Margaroli, P. Marino, K. Matera, M. E. Mattson, A. Mazzacane, P. Mazzanti, R. McNulty, A. Mehta, P. Mehtälä, C. Mesropian, T. Miao, D. Mietlicki, H. Miyake, S. Moêd, N. Moggi, C. S. Moon, R. W. Moore, M. J. Morello, A. Mukherjee, Th. Müller, P. Murat, M. Mussini, J. Nachtman, Y. Nagai, J. Naganoma, I. Nakano, A. Napier, J. Nett, T. Nigmanov, L. Nodulman, S. Y. Noh, O. Norniella, L. Oakes, S. H. Oh, Y. D. Oh, T. Okusawa, R. Orava, L. Ortolan, C. Pagliarone, P. Palni, V. Papadimitriou, W. Parker, G. Pauletta, M. Paulini, C. Paus, T. J. Phillips, G. Piacentino, E. Pianori, J. Pilot, K. Pitts, C. Plager, L. Pondrom, S. Poprocki, K. Potamianos, A. Pranko, F. Prokoshin, F. Ptohos, G. Punzi, P. Renton, M. Rescigno, F. Rimondi, L. Ristori, A. Robson, T. Rodriguez, S. Rolli, M. Ronzani, R. Roser, J. L. Rosner, F. Ruffini, A. Ruiz-Jimeno, J. Russ, V. Rusu, W. K. Sakumoto, Y. Sakurai, L. Santi, K. Satô, V. Saveliev, A. Savoy-Navarro, P. Schlabach, E. E. Schmidt, Thomas Schwarz, L. Scodellaro, F. Scuri, S. Seidel, Y. Seiya, А. Semenov, F. Šforza, S. Z. Shalhout, T. Shears, P. F. Shepard, M. Shimojima, M. J. Shochet, А. Симоненко, K. Śliwa, J. R. Smith, F. D. Snider, H. Song, V. Sorı́n, R. St. Denis, M. Stancari, D. Stentz, J. Strologas, Y. Sudo, A. Sukhanov, I. Suslov, K. Takemasa, Y. Takeuchi, J. Tang, M. Tecchio, P. K. Teng, J. Thom, E. Thomson, V. Thukral, D. Toback, S. Tokár, K. Tollefson, T. Tomura, D. Tonelli, S. Torre, D. Torretta, P. Totaro, M. Trovato, F. Ukegawa, S. Uozumi, F. Vázquez, G. Velev, C. Vellidis, C. Vernieri, J. Vizán, M. Vogel, M. Volpi, P. Wagner, R. Wallny, S. M. Wang, D. Waters, W. C. Wester, D. Whiteson, A. B. Wicklund, S. Wilbur, H. H. Williams, John S. Wilson, P. Wilson, B. L. Winer, P. Wittich, S. Wolbers, H. Wolfe, T. Wright, X. Wu, Z. Wu, K. Yamamoto, D. Yamato, T. Yang, U. K. Yang, Y. Yang, W.-M. Yao, G. P. Yeh, K. Yi, J. Yoh, K. Yorita, T. Yoshida, G. B. Yu, I. Yu, A. Zanetti, Y. Zeng, C. Zhou, S. Zucchelli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFermilabInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchAcademy of FinlandNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Science CouncilMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsLeptonTop quarkTevatronAsymmetryCollider Detector at FermilabPair productionMuonRapidityStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Nuclear physicsFermilabQuarkProduction (economics)PartonElectronHadronLarge Hadron Collider

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measure the forward--backward asymmetry of the production of top-quark and antiquark pairs in proton-antiproton collisions at center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=1.96\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ using the full data set collected by the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF) in Tevatron Run II corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $9.1\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. The asymmetry is characterized by the rapidity difference between top quarks and antiquarks ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}y$) and measured in the final state with two charged leptons (electrons and muons). The inclusive asymmetry, corrected to the entire phase space at parton level, is measured to be ${A}_{\mathrm{FB}}^{t\overline{t}}=0.12\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.13$, consistent with the expectations from the standard model (SM) and previous CDF results in the final state with a single charged lepton. The combination of the CDF measurements of the inclusive ${A}_{\mathrm{FB}}^{t\overline{t}}$ in both final states yields ${A}_{\mathrm{FB}}^{t\overline{t}}=0.160\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.045$, which is consistent with the SM predictions. We also measure the differential asymmetry as a function of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}y$. A linear fit to ${A}_{\mathrm{FB}}^{t\overline{t}}(|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}y|)$, assuming zero asymmetry at $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}y=0$, yields a slope of $\ensuremath{\alpha}=0.14\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.15$, consistent with the SM prediction and the previous CDF determination in the final state with a single charged lepton. The combined slope of ${A}_{\mathrm{FB}}^{t\overline{t}}(|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}y|)$ in the two final states is $\ensuremath{\alpha}=0.227\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.057$, which is $2.0\ensuremath{\sigma}$ larger than the SM prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→