MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290702690 · doi:10.14288/1.0166526

Health-related information practices and the experiences of young parents

2017· article· en· W2290702690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Young parents are targeted by a variety of health information interventions, aiming to educate and monitor them in order to improve population health. However, we know little about the ways young parents use health information or experience health information interventions in their everyday lives. Objectives: The objectives of the dissertation are to use a series of article-style chapters to: (1) describe the health-related information practices of young parents (Chapter 3); (2) explore how knowledge and expertise are discursively constructed within young parents’ health information worlds (Chapter 4); and (3) examine the functioning and values of population health information interventions in the lives of young parents (Chapter 5). Methods: The analyses presented in this dissertation are based on data collected via ethnographic observation at two Young Parent Programs and individual interviews with 37 young mothers and 2 young fathers ages 15-24 in Greater Vancouver, British Columbia. Data was analyzed in accordance with constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis. Results: Young parents in Greater Vancouver were often sophisticated health information seekers. Information assessment was a major task, for which young parents employed various methods of triangulation. These practices took place in social worlds that discursively constructed the “teen mom” as paradoxically knowledgeable (in matters of sexuality and technology) and ignorant (in matters of parenting and health. Population health information interventions (communication and surveillance) were prominent in these social worlds, and carried ethical implications for social justice. Young parent acceptance varied depending on the positionality of those implementing interventions, as well as their intrusiveness and level of stigmatization of young parents. Conclusion: By investigating, documenting, and theorizing the ways young parents interact with health information in the contexts of their everyday lives, this study generated theory that can help inform information interventions aimed at supporting this public health priority population. Programs and materials for young parents should take into account the heterogeneity of their childcare experience and parenting knowledge, as well as cultural norms. Future research should further explore the intersection between individual information practices and health information interventions, and test the emergent theoretical propositions related to population health information interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it