Stock Fundamentals Model Based on Genetic Algorithm-Rough Set
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Security investment problems are mostly highly-nonlinear and have huge operations, hence quantitative investment is applied to make decisions frequently. Considering the example of Medicine plate in Chinese stocks, fundamental indicators and technical indicators are combined, and then investment decisions are made and optimized stepwise based on rough set model, where generical gorithm is applied to solve the model, aiming at searching for a portfolio with high value and growth inside the whole medicine plate. In addition, such strategy elements as trend and goodness are considered in the prediction, evaluation and correction of the model, resulting in lower uncertainty of index selection. In the empirical example, with the use of the improved model, stock rankings inside the plate achieve an accuracy of 60.7%, which proves the model makes sense to some extent in the security investment.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it