MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290748734 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2016.2518178

Multi-Frequency DEP Cytometer Employing a Microwave Sensor for Dielectric Analysis of Single Cells

2016· article· en· W2290748734 on OpenAlexafffund
Samaneh Afshar, Elham Salimi, Katrin Braasch, Michael Butler, D. J. Thomson, Greg E. Bridges

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsDielectrophoresisMaterials scienceDielectricMicrowaveCapacitanceMicrofluidicsElectrical impedanceOptoelectronicsCapacitive sensingElectrodeFrequency responsePhysicsNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a microfluidic device for in-flow dielectric characterization of single biological cells. The dielectric spectrum is obtained by measuring the multiple-frequency dielectrophoresis (DEP) response of individual cells as they travel over an array of sensing and actuating electrodes. The DEP induced translation of each cell is detected by measuring the differential impedance of the array using a microwave interferometer, which is capable of sub-attofarad sensitivity, and is coupled to the sensing electrodes. The DEP response of a cell at multiple frequencies in the beta-dispersion region is chosen to discern particular cell dielectric properties as it travels along the array-such as cytoplasm conductivity and membrane capacitance. The Clausius-Mossotti factor of the cell is determined from the measured response signal in conjunction with numerical simulation of its trajectory. The approach is validated through measuring polystyrene microspheres. The DEP response of Chinese hamster ovary cells using two simultaneous frequencies is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207