MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2290754393 · doi:10.1090/tran/7138

Derivative of the standard 𝑝-adic 𝐿-function associated with a Siegel form

2016· article· en· W2290754393 on OpenAlexaff
Giovanni Rosso

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureDerivative (finance)Zero (linguistics)GenusFunction (biology)Pure mathematicsWeight functionSiegel modular formRepresentation (politics)CombinatoricsMathematical analysisModular form

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we first construct a two-variable p p -adic L L -function for the standard representation associated with a Hida family of parallel weight genus g g Siegel forms, using a method developed by Böcherer–Schmidt in one variable. When a form f f has weight g + 1 g+1 a non-crystalline trivial zero could appear. In this case, using the two-variable p p -adic L L -function we have constructed, we can apply the method of Greenberg–Stevens to calculate the first derivative of the p p -adic L L -function for f f and show that it has the form predicted by a conjecture of Greenberg on trivial zeros.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society→Same topicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry→French-language works237,207→