MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290767110 · doi:10.1090/proc/13324

Davies’ method for anomalous diffusions

2016· preprint· en· W2290767110 on OpenAlexaff
Mathav Murugan, Laurent Saloff‐Coste

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsPacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHeat kernelDiagonalSingularityMathematicsCutoffGaussianKernel (algebra)Sobolev spaceUpper and lower boundsEnergy (signal processing)ComputationPerturbation (astronomy)Applied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisStatistical physicsPhysicsAlgorithmGeometryQuantum mechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Davies’ method of perturbed semigroups is a classical technique to obtain off-diagonal upper bounds on the heat kernel. However Davies’ method does not apply to anomalous diffusions due to the singularity of energy measures. In this note, we overcome the difficulty by modifying the Davies’ perturbation method to obtain sub-Gaussian upper bounds on the heat kernel. Our computations closely follow the seminal work of Carlen, Kusuoka and Stroock (1987). However, a cutoff Sobolev inequality due to Andres and Barlow (2015) is used to bound the energy measure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207