MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290836051

MEMS based cardiac bio-enzyme detection for the acute myocardial syndrome recognition

2005· article· en· W2290836051 on OpenAlexaff
Ion Stiharu, Subhash Rakheja, Muthukumaran Packirisamy, Amirstar Jeetender

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelittinCantileverMicroelectromechanical systemsBlood streamMaterials scienceBee venomBiomedical engineeringEnzymeCardiac muscleNanotechnologyMedicineChemistryBiochemistryInternal medicineBiologyPeptideComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract:- Early detection through enzymatic identification and confirmation is essential for diagnosis and prevention as in the case of Acute Myocardial Syndrome (AMS). Biochemical markers continue to be an important clinical tool for the enzymatic detection. The advent of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) devices can enable the use of various microstructures for the detection of enzymes. In this study, the concept of MEMS is applied for the detection of enzyme reaction, in which micro-cantilevers undergo changes in mechanical behavior that can be optically detected when enzyme molecules react on their surface, inducing geometric modifications. This paper presents the static behavior of micro-cantilevers under antigen-antibody reaction of rabbit skeletal muscle troponin C (TnC) and bee venom melittin (ME). The same troponin C is detected in the blood stream in humans a couple of hours form the acute myocardial infarction. The reported experimental results provide valuable information that will be useful in the development of MEMS sensors for enzymatic detection. The surface stress produced due to enzyme reactions results in the bending of cantilevers as similar to the influencing of laminar stress in the cantilevers. A possible design of such a system is provided in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207