MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290840288 · doi:10.15173/jpc.v4i1.2611

World War I and the birth of public relations

2015· article· en· W2290840288 on OpenAlex
Ira Basen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Professional Communication · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Canadian institutionsCBC (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicityPublic opinionPolitical scienceAgency (philosophy)PublicsSociologyLawPublic relationsMedia studiesSocial sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This commentary in the Journal of Professional Communication discusses the historical origins of the public relations profession. It discusses how United States President Woodrow Wilson created the Committee on Public Information which was formed to favrouably influence opinion among American citizens toward the war effort in Europe. Ivy Lee’s early influence is detailed, as he was the first one to open a public relations agency. As well, the importance of Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud who worked for the Latin American section of the Committee on Public Information is described. Bernays and Lee moved public relations from the publicity model employed by P. T. Barnum to a model of two-way communication where both the organization and its publics felt that they were gaining something from their relationship. ©Journal of Professional Communication, all rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it