MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2290873011 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.atp76

Abstract TP76: Medium-Term Angiographic Follow-up and Packing Density Analysis in a Series of 67 Consecutive Intracranial Aneurysms Treated Endovascularly with a Single Coil

2013· article· en· W2290873011 on OpenAlexaff
Josser E Delgado Almandoz, B Crandall, J Fease, Yasha Kadkhodayan, J Scholz, Ruth E Anderson, D Tubman

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsCrandall University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmOcclusionSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To determine the medium-term angiographic outcome and packing density threshold for complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up in a series of cerebral aneurysms treated with a single coil. Methods: We retrospectively identified all cerebral aneurysms treated with a single coil at our institution from July 1997 until September 2011. We recorded aneurysm dimensions, neck size, packing density, and follow-up catheter or MR angiograms to determine the angiographic outcome at last follow-up according to the Raymond scale. We then performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the likelihood of complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up to determine the packing density maximum operating point (MOP). Results: Eighty-one aneurysms in 79 patients were treated with a single coil at our institution during the study period. Sixty-four patients were female (81%) and mean age was 53 years (range 23-87 years). Mean maximum aneurysm dimension was 2.8mm (range 1.6-4.8mm), and mean dome-to-neck ratio was 1.3 (median 1.3, range 0.8-1.9). Mean aneurysm packing density was 35.3% (median 32.8%, range 10.2-94.3%). Three patients with ruptured aneurysms died during the hospitalization (7.7%), and follow-up angiographic examinations were performed in 65 patients with 67 aneurysms (85.9%). Mean time to last angiographic follow-up was 26.4 months (range 4-102 months). Complete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up was present in 46 aneurysms (68.7%), a neck remnant in 16 aneurysms (23.9%) and sac recanalization in 5 aneurysms (7.4%). ROC analysis of the likelihood of complete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up yielded a packing density MOP of >36.3%, with a specificity of 85.7%, sensitivity of 47.8%, and an area under the curve of 0.61 (95%CI 0.49-0.73). There was a statistically-significant difference in the likelihood of complete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up between the 25 aneurysms with a packing density >36.3% (88%), and the 42 aneurysms with a packing density ≤36.3% (57.1%, OR 5.5 [95%CI 1.4-21.3], p-value 0.009). Conclusion: Achieving a packing density >36.3% predicts a significantly higher likelihood (88%) of complete aneurysm occlusion at medium-term angiographic follow-up in cerebral aneurysms treated with a single coil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→