Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the use of a friendly full-duplex (FD) relay to increase the secrecy rate over a fading channel between the legitimate source and destination in the presence of a naive or informed eavesdropper. Naive eavesdropper can only decode the received signals either from the source or from the relay, while informed eavesdropper can overhear signals transmitted from both the source and relay. Accordingly, we compare the achievable secrecy rates of FD relay with traditional half-duplex (HD) relay in terms of the channel state information (CSI) between nodes, eavesdropper types, and the self-interference (SI) in FD-Relay. We consider the non-convex power allocation problems for the developed FD-relay to maximize the secrecy rate under the power constraints and develop an efficient iterative algorithm based on the difference-of-two-concave-functions (DC) programming. The analytical and simulation results confirm that FD relay offers significant improvements in the secrecy rate over the HD-Relay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".