MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2290975760 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417481

Spatial Modulation in MIMO Cognitive Radio Networks with Channel Estimation Errors and Primary Interference Constraint

2015· article· en· W2290975760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPairwise error probabilityCognitive radioRayleigh fadingMIMOTransmitterAlgorithmInterference (communication)Constraint (computer-aided design)Upper and lower boundsComputer scienceExpression (computer science)MathematicsFadingAntenna diversityChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the use of spatial modulation (SM) in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) cognitive radio networks considering the primary receiver interference constraint and the maximum transmit power of the secondary transmitter. In particular, we investigate the effect of estimation errors on the secondary system performance, where a closed-form expression is derived for the average pairwise error probability (PEP) in Rayleigh fading environments. Based on this PEP expression, a tight upper bounded average bit error probability is obtained using the union bound formula. In addition, an asymptotic analysis is conducted and simple approximate expressions are derived to get useful insights on the system diversity and estimation errors' effects. Numerical results, which are validated through simulations, show that the SM is robust against estimation errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it