SHORT-TERM RESULTS OF CARDIOSYNCHRONIZED CONSEQUENTIAL ANTEGRADE PNEUMOCOMPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIFOCAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of CCAPC in complex treatment of the patients with multifocal atherosclerosis and involvement of the heart and lower extremities arteries. Material and methods. Totally 74 patients included (66 men and 8 women), mean age 63,2±9,3 y.: 32 (43%) with IIa stage and 42 (57%) with IIb stage of lower extremities ischemia; 58 (80%) with II functional class of angina and 16 (20%) with III functional class (by CCS). CCAPC was performed on a “CARDIOPULSAR” software-hardware complex. The protocol of the study consisted in 30 procedures by 60 min. per day. Efficacy of CCAPC was assessed by the changes in EchoCG, 6-minute walking test, DPW, ABI, LDF, activity index DASI, Edinburgh questionnaire of intermittent claudication. Results. The regression of clinical symptoms was found in all patients after the treatment by CCAPC in cardiosynchronized angioregimen: the significant increase of exercise tolerance was found as DPW, ABI, DASI values, microcirculation parameters by LDF. The assessment of EchoCG parameters (EDS, ESS, EDV, ESV, LVEF) and functional class of angina revealed that after the course of CCAPC coronary blood flow did not change significantly. All patients had a subjective improvement: physical activities increased, dyscomfort in lower extremities decreased as the feelings of chills and cold. Conclusion. CCAPC is a novel important non-invasive effective and safe method of multifocal atherosclerosis treatment involving the heart and lower extremities vessels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".