MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Pharmacokinetic Characterisation Of Recombinant FXIII Across Age Groups In Patients With FXIII Subunit A Congenital Deficiency

2013· article· en· W2290986859 on OpenAlexaff
Brigitte Brand‐Staufer, Manuel Carção, Bryce A. Kerlin, Diane J. Nugent, Andrew Will, Michael D. Williams, Anders Rosholm, Mia Lundblad

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacokineticsDosingClinical trialInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Three trials, F13CD-1725, F13CD-3760 and F13CD-3720 have investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of recombinant FXIII (rFXIII), given at a dose of 35 IU/kg once monthly, in a total of 54 patients with FXIII congenital deficiency (Inbal A et al Blood 2012;119(22):5111-5117; Williams M et al Haemophilia 2013;DOI:10.1111/hae.12224; Kerlin B et al JTH 2013;11(Suppl 2):235-236). The aim of the current analysis was to assess and compare the PK characteristics of rFXIII among trials and 3 different age groups of patients (1-<6, 6-17 and ≥18 years). Methods All patients were dosed with rFXIII 35 IU/kg every 4th week. Blood samples for PK assessments were collected regularly throughout the dosing interval (28 to 30-day period) in the 3 trials: in the pivotal phase 3 trial, F13CD-1725, at 1 hour, 14 and 28 days post-dose; in the paediatric F13CD-3760 trial at 0.5 and 24 hours and 7, 14, 21 and 30 days post-dose; and in the F13CD-3720 phase 3 extension trial at 1 and 2 hours and 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose. Prior to the PK assessment, all but 2 patients had received treatment with repeated doses of either plasma derived FXIII products or rFXIII, thus all PK measurements were performed at steady-state. The Berichrom® FXIII activity assay was used for measurement of FXIII activity. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental statistical methods, without baseline adjustment. The results include data from a total of 54 patients, aged 1 to 60 years; 41 in the F13CD-1725 trial, 23 in the F13CD-3720 trial (including 16 patients who also participated in F13CD-1725), and 6 in the F13CD-3760 trial. Results The non-compartmental PK parameters (Cmax, Ctrough, AUC0-28/30d, t1/2) were similar across the 3 age groups (Table 1). Post-hoc, pairwise t-tests across the age groups of log-transformed data did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences, when adjusting p-values for multiple testing. Additionally, separate ANOVA analyses of each of the parameters, showed no significant differences across the groups. The geometric mean half-life ranged from 11.6 to 15.0 days (Figure 1), and the trough FXIII activity levels ranged from 0.15 to 0.21 IU/mL (Figure 2). The geometric mean recoveries were also in the same range; 0.015 (F13CD-1725), 0.013 (F13CD-3760) and 0.020 (F13CD-3720) (IU/mL)/(IU/kg). Furthermore, it could be demonstrated that the mean PK profiles were similar for the 3 trials, and that Cmax and Ctrough values, as well as FXIII exposures (AUC), were constant over time, based on results from patients participating in both the F13CD-1725 and the F13CD-3720 trial. Conclusion The PK profile of rFXIII, after dosing with 35 IU/kg of rFXIII, was independent of age and comparable between trials. It was further demonstrated that FXIII trough activity levels were constant over time, when comparing the individual levels of FXIII activity in patients participating in both the F13CD-1725 and the F13CD-3720 trials. Despite rather large individual variation (CV of up to 38%) in the maximal FXIII activity levels, all individual mean trough activity levels were above 0.1 IU/mL during the entire duration of the trials. The results support that monthly dosing with 35 IU/kg of rFXIII to patients with FXIII subunit A deficiency, regardless of age, is adequate for prophylaxis. Nevertheless individual PK measurements to determine optimal dose and dosing frequency should be considered due to patient variation. Disclosures: Brand-Staufer: Bayer HealthCare: Travel support, Travel support Other; Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support Other; Bayer: DMC Chair for a Bayer study Other. Carção:Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, Travel Support. Other; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel Support., Travel Support. Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board. Travel Support., Speakers Bureau, Travel Support. Other; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel Support., Travel Support. Other; Biogen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel Support., Travel Support. Other; Bayer : Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Support. , Travel Support. Other; Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel Support. Other. Kerlin:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Nugent:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Will:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Williams:Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support., Travel support. Other; Bayer: Travel support, Travel support Other; Baxter: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support. Other. Rosholm:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Sandberg Lundblad:Novo Nordisk: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→