Immobilization of horseradish peroxidase on modified PAN‐based membranes for the removal of phenol from buffer solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes have been widely used in many separation processes. In this paper, horseradish peroxidase was immobilized onto polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde. The immobilized enzyme possessed a protein loading of 0.025 mg/cm2membrane and a specific activity of 105 U/mgprotein (105 μmol/min/mgprotein). The initial modified and immobilized membranes were observed using SEM and FTIR. Potential applications of HRP membranes were investigated in the removal of phenol through oxidation with the addition of hydrogen peroxide. The optimum pH of the immobilized enzyme was determined to be 6.0, and the optimum hydrogen peroxide concentration to be 30 mmol/L. Almost 100 % removal of phenol (1 ∼ 10 mg/L) from water was achieved by HRP membranes. For high concentrated solutions, successive cycles were successfully used to improve the degree of phenol oxidation. Furthermore, the immobilized horseradish peroxidase was operationally stable. These results suggest that the HRP membrane has promising applications for the removal of phenol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".