MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291173347

Satellite Monitoring of First Year Sea Ice Decay

2001· article· en· W2291173347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger De Abreu, John Yackel, David G. Barber, Matthew Arkett

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceAdvanced very-high-resolution radiometerArctic ice packSea ice thicknessDrift iceArcticClimatologyEnvironmental scienceCryosphereSatelliteRadiometerOceanographyMeteorologyGeologyRemote sensingGeographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Ice Service (CIS), a branch of the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC), is mandated to continually monitor ice conditions in Canadian coastal areas in order to support ship navigation and other marine activities in waters where ice is present. New initiatives within the CIS require the development of techniques whereby the state of Arctic first year sea ice melt can be accurately assessed by those satellite-borne sensors used operationally by the CIS, primarily RADARSAT-1 and the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometers. The seasonal decay of sea ice causes and is caused by physical changes in the ice volume. These changes ultimately result in the sea ice losing mechanical strength (Johnston et al., 2001), thus easing ship navigation, but increasing risk to those working or traveling on first year ice. Importantly, the sea ice volume’s optical, thermal and electrical properties are modified significantly by melt-related physical changes. As a result, the appearance of first year sea ice, in both AVHRR and RADARSAT-1 data, changes with the onset of melt conditions in the Arctic. With the help of other sea ice scientists, CIS is trying to characterize these signature changes and relate them to ice strength (Johnston et al., 2001). The end result of this work should be the capability of CIS to routinely assess ice decay from AVHRR and RADARSAT- 1 data. This information will ultimately be used to help support the new Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System (AIRSS) (AIRSS, 1996).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic ConditionsSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207