MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291225526 · doi:10.5555/2888619.2889076

Online simulation modeling of prefabricated wall panel production using RFID system

2015· article· en· W2291225526 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammed Sadiq Altaf, Hexu Liu, Mohamed Al‐Hussein, Haitao Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrefabricationDiscrete event simulationFrame (networking)Computer scienceReal-time computingProduction (economics)Radio-frequency identificationEvent (particle physics)Simulation modelingModeling and simulationControl (management)SimulationEngineeringEmbedded systemCivil engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of discrete-event simulation (DES) in the construction and manufacturing industry has been increasing significantly over the past few decades. However, DES at present is mainly utilized during the construction planning phase as a planning tool, and it still remains a challenge to apply simulation during the execution phase for the purpose of construction control without an automated real-time data acquisition system. This study exploits an approach that involves the integration of a radio frequency identification (RFID) system and DES model in order to capture the real-time production state into the simulation model, thereby enabling real-time, simulation-based performance monitoring. The proposed methodology is implemented at Landmark Building Solutions, a wood-frame panel prefabrication plant in Edmonton, Canada. A simulation model is developed in Simphony.NET and integrated with the RFID system in order to enable the online simulation and to obtain real-time simulation results for the purpose of production control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWinter Simulation ConferenceSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207